(no subject)
Nov. 22nd, 2005 09:42 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Manners? Whoulda thunk it?
I admire this guy, and not because I'm anti-child -- *everyone* should behave themselves in public, and we learn it as children. There are places we can be loud and boisterous, and places where we speak in more moderate tones and sit calmly. Children have to learn that, and parents have to teach it. This guy is just promoting that process.
::waiting for the onslaught::
I admire this guy, and not because I'm anti-child -- *everyone* should behave themselves in public, and we learn it as children. There are places we can be loud and boisterous, and places where we speak in more moderate tones and sit calmly. Children have to learn that, and parents have to teach it. This guy is just promoting that process.
::waiting for the onslaught::
Agreed in principle, but not in deed?
Date: 2005-11-22 03:56 pm (UTC)That being said, the other problem he is encountering is that the good parents often have the well-behaved children. Not always, but often the unruly children are that way because the parents are ape-shit nutzo. I appreciated greatly the comment that the people making the complaints against his policy were the *ahem* people with high senses of self-entitlement. In other words, the parents are the real spoiled brats. The little apples don't fall too far from the tree, and probably act out because their parents can't be interrupted from all their self-indulgent self-love to parent, and so they demonstrate ugly behavior just to get any attention at all.
Now, I know that I do not refer to all parents of any child who acts out -- of course not. However, our society has taken a decidedly ugly "me me me" turn. ("Screw you - I will NOT keep it down! I'm Paris HILTON!") Where are the ideals of community, respect, compassion and the rights of others? THOSE are family values -- not the rest of the crap that's being promoted by the same phrase. I dislike the sign on the door only because it should not be necessary to have to remind people how to behave, not because I disagree with his right to fight back.
Re: Agreed in principle, but not in deed?
Date: 2005-11-22 06:06 pm (UTC)Re: Agreed in principle, but not in deed?
Date: 2005-11-22 08:24 pm (UTC)Harumph -- passive slut-basher! *snicker*
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 04:31 am (UTC)But, yup, agree with all else you put up there.
Oh.. except for the tin ceiling part... *If* the ceiling he's refering to is of the type my mind instantly pictured it to be (antique, tooled tin) then there is *no* way I'd want it covered up. Those things are pretty, precious, and most have disappeared from view already, often destroyed rather than just covered.
Now if its just tin for noise value, that's another story...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 08:15 pm (UTC)Also, I don't know if you took the "all ages" portion from my comment. Just to clarify, I alluded to "child or adult child", which I intended as immature people of ALL ages. *g*